I am wondering if there is a method in Renzi’s approach to things. A method aiming to get explicit controversies following his actions, finalized to amplify the media impact they have.
Otherwise why he did a good thing like pulling the plug to the almost paralyzed Letta government only after having vocally vowed loyalty to it, and why now he did a great thing like positioning a considerable number of women as chairperson of the top Italian companies, but picking few with obvious interest conflicts?
http://www.repubblica.it/economia/finanza/2014/04/14/news/83583927-83583927/?ref=NRCT–2
Ms Marcegaglia and Ms Todini are for sure better and more prepared than many former chairmen, but owning their own company (that is still true for Ms Marcegaglia) is a fertile turf for conflicts and recriminations. Weren’t there more pure managers like Patrizia Grieco available?
Anyhow, I believe it is a great rupture, and if the theatrical tongue for controversies is an unavoidable part of the show, it is likely an ok price to pay… but I keep hoping we could start doing the right things… right.
nosacrificeblog 